17 / september / 2022.
21 / may / 2022.
28 / april / 2022.
24 / february / 2022.
Read the full text (in Serbian) written by our team here.
29 / september / 2021.
As in other countries in midst of the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic, the process of mass immunization is taking place in the Republic of Serbia. Various obstacles, numerous discussions and various questions are emerging in the course of this process, however. The protection of basic human rights guaranteed by international conventions, the Constitution and by domestic law is often being used as an argument. Public attention is focused particularly on the right to respect one is private and family life.
Among other, the European Court of Human Rights interprets the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights through its case law. Herewith, we are chiming in into the general discussion and offer insight into the interpretation of some provisions of the Convention by posting a very brief overview of the judgment in the case of Vavřička and Others v. the Czech Republic, which was made public today. Also we suggest clicking here to read the full text of the judgment.
The case ended up before the Grand Chamber of the Court eventually. In the final decision, among other, the Grand Chamber reasoned that the general duty to vaccinate children against nine diseases, otherwise well known in medicine, did not infringe the right to respect for private and family life guaranteed by the Convention.
Read the full text (in Serbian) written by Andjelka Markovic here.
27 / september / 2021.
The Court has also received a significant number of requests for issuance of interim measures. Below is a brief overview of few decisions that the Court issued in the previous period (regarding both applications filed and the requests filed, as well as an overview of the content of certain applications that the Court has declared admissible and which are currently being considered).
Read the full text (in Serbian) written by Andjelka Markovic here.
08 / april / 2021.
As in other countries, in midst of the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic, the process od mass immunization is under way in the Republic of Serbia. Various obstacles, numerous discussions and various questions emerge, however, in the course of this process.
Among other, the European Court of Human Rights interprets the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights through its case law. Herewith, we are chiming in into the general discussion and offer insight into the interpretation of some provisions of the Convention by posting a very brief overview of the judgment in the case of Vavřička and Others v. the Czech Republic, which was made public today.
The case ended up before the Grand Chamber of the Court eventually. In the final decision, among other, the Grand Chamber reasoned that the general duty to vaccinate children against nine diseases, otherwise well known in medicine, did not infringe the right to respect for private and family life guaranteed by the Convention.
Read the full text (in Serbian) written by Andjelka Markovic here.